Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-11T21:55:49Z
dc.date.available2010-08-11T21:55:49Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationTaylor, Catherine. "Fatally flawed? Discursive evidence from the movement to establish Lesbian Studies programs." Feminism & Psychology 20(4) (2011): 218–227. DOI: 10.1177/0959353510370181.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10680/144
dc.description.abstractWhile related areas such as Queer Studies and Sexuality Studies have become established as disciplinary formations in North American and British universities, Lesbian Studies has not. This article reports on an analysis of key publications by critics and advocates of Lesbian Studies to explore the possibility that Lesbian Studies was flawed in ways that account for its non-emergence. Charges against Lesbian Studies include naïve essentialism, white middle-classness, separatism, and paranoia. Discourse analysis of books by Lesbian Studies advocates examines evidence of each of these qualities and concludes that Lesbian Studies was above all too lesbian to be successfully integrated into the enduringly heteropatriarchal institution of universities.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Winnipegen_US
dc.description.urihttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0959353510370181
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFeminism and Psychologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectLesbian Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRaceen_US
dc.subjectIdentityen_US
dc.titleFatally Flawed? : Discursive Evidence from the Movement to Establish Lesbian Studies Programsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0959353510370181


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée