Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorCoutts, Steven
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-14T14:53:36Z
dc.date.available2016-03-14T14:53:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-02-01
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-894858-41-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10680/1105
dc.descriptionPaper: 14pp., digital file.en_US
dc.description.abstractMixed-income housing has long been promoted as a panacea to the largely-failed social housing experiments of the mid-twentieth century. However, more often than not, the social mix philosophy leads to more problems than it solves. It amounts to a spatial solution to what are complex social and spatial problems. Moreover, the support for this approach calls into question its true motives: is it intended to truly benefit low-income populations or is it merely a form of stealth gentrification? A better solution would be to identify assets within existing low-income housing developments and increase investments in a targeted fashion, rather than expecting benefits to trickle down.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Urban Studiesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesStudent Paper Series;32
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectMixed-income housing -- canada
dc.subjectHousing policy -- canada
dc.subjectHousing policy -- manitoba -- winnipeg
dc.titleMixed-Income Housing Developments: Separating Myth from Realityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée