• English
    • français
  • English 
    • English
    • français
View Item 
  •   WinnSpace Home
  • Department of Biology
  • Craig K. R. Willis
  • View Item
  •   WinnSpace Home
  • Department of Biology
  • Craig K. R. Willis
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Success stories and emerging themes in conservation physiology

Thumbnail

View Open

Willis - Success stories and emerging themes.pdf (1.525Mb)

Metadata

Show full item record

Author

Madliger, Christine L.
Cooke, Steven J.
Crespi, Erica J.
Funk, Jennifer L.
Hultine, Kevin R.
Hunt, Kathleen E.
Rohr, Jason R.
Sinclair, Brent J.
Suski, Cory D.
Willis, Craig K. R.
Love, Oliver P.

Uri

http://hdl.handle.net/10680/1262

Date

2016

Doi

10.1093/conphys/cov057

Citation

Madliger, C. L., S. J. Cooke, E. J. Crespi, J. L. Funk, K. R. Hultine, K. E. Hunt, J. R. Rohr, B. J. Sinclair, C. D. Suski, C. K. R. Willis, and O. P. Love. "Success stories and emerging themes in conservation physiology." Conserv Physiol 4(1) (2016): cov057. DOI:10.1093/conphys/cov057.

Abstract

The potential benefits of physiology for conservation are well established and include greater specificity of management techniques, determination of cause–effect relationships, increased sensitivity of health and disturbance monitoring and greater capacity for predicting future change. While descriptions of the specific avenues in which conservation and physiology can be integrated are readily available and important to the continuing expansion of the discipline of ‘conservation physiology’, to date there has been no assessment of how the field has specifically contributed to conservation success. However, the goal of conservation physiology is to foster conservation solutions and it is therefore important to assess whether physiological approaches contribute to downstream conservation outcomes and management decisions. Here, we present eight areas of conservation concern, ranging from chemical contamination to invasive species to ecotourism, where physiological approaches have led to beneficial changes in human behaviour, management or policy. We also discuss the shared characteristics of these successes, identifying emerging themes in the discipline. Specifically, we conclude that conservation physiology: (i) goes beyond documenting change to provide solutions; (ii) offers a diversity of physiological metrics beyond glucocorticoids (stress hormones); (iii) includes approaches that are transferable among species, locations and times; (iv) simultaneously allows for human use and benefits to wildlife; and (v) is characterized by successes that can be difficult to find in the primary literature. Overall, we submit that the field of conservation physiology has a strong foundation of achievements characterized by a diversity of conservation issues, taxa, physiological traits, ecosystem types and spatial scales. We hope that these concrete successes will encourage the continued evolution and use of physiological tools within conservation-based research and management plans.

Collections

  • Craig K. R. Willis

Report a copyright concern

Contact Us | Send Feedback
 

 

Browse

All of WinnSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Report a copyright concern

Contact Us | Send Feedback